Monitoring of Operational Testing and MIL-STD-810

Monitoring of Operational Tests

Monitoring of operational tests and the recording of all critical performance parameters has become a requirement in MIL-STD-810H.

Operational testing has been a part of MIL-STD-810 since Revision C in 1975.  It refers to testing the item in a manner that represents service use as documented in the mission profile.  Successive revisions have placed more stringent requirements on this mode of testing.  Monitoring of operational tests is one such requirement. 

Requirements  as specified in Revision G change 1 Part 1, paragraph 5.10 reads as follows:

Performance check. Monitoring and recording of test item’s critical performance parameters is required before and after all tests. Monitoring of performance parameters is not required during non-operational tests such as storage and transportation. Monitoring of performance parameters during operational tests is strongly suggested.

Where cost concerns preclude monitoring during an operational test, consideration should be given to the consequences of undetected, intermittent failures.”

Revision H has changed the wording of the last two sentences of that paragraph to:

Monitoring and recording of the critical performance parameters during operational tests is required. If unable to monitor during operational tests, obtain test sponsor approval prior to the start of testing and document rationale in the test report.”

Monitoring of Operational Testing

Development of Monitoring and Simulation Equipment

Environmental testing has the capability of inducing intermittent failures in equipment.  Detection of these failures is critical in Developmental Testing and Evaluation to ensure a product’s capabilities during field testing and deployment.  These increased requirements call for a more diligent approach to the design and planning of monitoring equipment used in operational testing. 

Designing, building, and programming the required (off chamber) equipment requires time and resources.  Monitoring equipment should be capable of detecting recording and capturing intermittent failure conditions.  It should then notify test personnel of failures.  It should record all critical functions and exercise the Unit Under Test (UUT) to simulate in service operation. 

Additionally, it should be able to aid in the performance of functional and operational tests.  These tests are used to verify all modes of operation of the UUT before, during and after environmental tests.

Evolution of MIL-STD-810 Environmental Testing

Many issues have evolved during various revisions of MIL-STD-810.  A study of the history of these issues show a repeated effort by those writing the standard to stress areas where materiel developers have fallen short in developmental test and evaluation.  This has been the case with test parameter tailoring, power requirements, and yes, the methods utilized in operational testing.

There are numerous issues that can cause intermittent issues in electrical and electronic equipment: 

  • Tolerance stacking of components can often lead to intermittent failures during temperature testing. 
  • Humidity can cause intermittent reductions in the electrical isolation of signals. 
  • Dynamic testing, especially where higher frequencies are present, i.e. Pyroshock testing, can cause piezoelectric effects. 

These intermittent failures can lead to unexpected behaviors from equipment that can result in a number of safety related issues especially when the equipment being tested is mission critical.  The increased requirements in MIL-STD-810 no doubt can be traced to issues encountered during operational testing or during service.

In essence, a “green light” on the UUT is no longer a suitable solution, if indeed it ever was.  Properly designed equipment is required monitoring operational tests during tests. It is impossible for a human to monitor a test of long duration or perceive short intermittent failures.

Other Requirements for Monitoring and Simulation Equipment

Such monitoring equipment is also useful in EMI/EMC testing for detecting susceptibility issues.  It can also exercise the equipment under test to provide representative operation necessary for adequate evaluation of equipment emissions.  Operational testing is a requirement for most EMI/EMC testing. 

It is definitely a requirement for MIL-STD-461 testing.  Operation of equipment in standard modes is required for modes of testing in this standard including conducted emissions, radiated emissions, conducted susceptibility, and radiated susceptibility. 

For emissions testing, exercising the Equipment Under Test (EUT) exercises it to create a nominally characteristic level of electromagnetic behavior.  During susceptibility testing however, great care must be taken to monitor the EUT for operational failures caused by the presence of electromagnetic fields and electrostatic discharges.

The same holds true for electrical compatibility testing.  This testing includes standards such as MIL-STD-704, MIL-STD-1275, and MIL-STD-1399-300B parts 1 and 2.

CVG Strategy Product Test and Evaluation Experts

Our experts at CVG Strategy have extensive experience in Environmental and EMI/EMC testing and evaluation.  We have expertise in a number of industries and products, both military and commercial.  CVG Strategy specializes in Independent Developmental Testing and Evaluation including: Development of Life Cycle Environmental Profiles, Test Plans, Test Program Management, and Test Witnessing.

CVG Strategy also offers MIL-STD-810 Webinars that stress methods for employing this important test standard to get the most out of your test and evaluation program.

CVG Strategy is a consultancy offering coaching, mentoring, training and program development focused on areas including Product Test and Evaluation Business Process Improvement, Export Compliance, Cyber Security and Quality Management Systems.

Jamie Hamilton

Jamie Hamilton

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email